The New York State Commissioner of Education MaryEllen Elia and the President of the State University of New York Nancy Zimpher announced a plan to recruit more teachers. The teacher educators at SUNY immediately blasted the proposal.m as deeply flawed.
The elements of the plan are not especially original. Recruit more teachers of color. Internships in schools. Career ladder. Etc.
The problem with the plan is that it does not address the root causes of the teacher shortage. The root causes are state and federal policies that discourage and demoralize teachers.
Nothing was said about eliminating the edTPA or making it optional; the test has a disparate impact on teachers of color and is opposed by many who prepare teachers.
Nothing is said about the other tests for future teachers that have a disparate impact on teachers of color.
Nothing is said about the state’s teacher evaluation system, based on test scores, which is unreliable, unstable, and invalid. In the case of Sheri Lederman, decided recently, the judge tossed out her evaluation because of its inaccuracy. Many teachers are leaving the profession because of this system.
Nothing is said about the nonstop testing and test prep that demoralizes teachers and wastes instructional time.
Elia and Zimpher are trying to fix a major problem while ignoring the root causes. That won’t work.
The union that represents the faculty and staff of SUNY released the following statement:
“A report by SUNY’s TeachNY Advisory Council on teacher education is flawed, incomplete and fails to tap the experience of SUNY education professionals who teach and mentor future teachers across the state, according to United University Professions President Frederick E. Kowal, Ph.D.
“The report, heralded by SUNY as a “historic partnership” between SUNY and the State Education Department, glosses over glaring problems with the state’s teacher certification exams and their impact on teacher shortages and the lack of diversity in teacher ed programs. The study ignores recent changes implemented by the state Board of Regents and inappropriately cites reform groups such as the National Council on Teacher Quality as experts.
“Some of the report’s recommendations directly conflict with actual experiences of SUNY teacher educators. Also missing: mentions of outstanding practices and new teacher ed developments already underway in the field.
“TeachNY is a smoke screen that bolsters the failed policy of former Commissioner John King, which SUNY Chancellor Nancy Zimpher appears to endorse,” said Kowal. “It is insulting to SUNY’s teacher education faculty and staff, and seriously out of touch with the widespread rejection of the top-down reform agenda that has undermined the work of educators and their students.
“This report is pretentious and overreaches in an attempt to design standards for a profession that is highly regulated,” Kowal continued. “This report is one more misguided critique that is disconnected from reality.”
“Kowal said that UUP and NYSUT attempted to work with SUNY on the report, but pulled away when teacher education professionals were given no real voice in vetting the council’s recommendations. The report’s findings lack a “full range of input” from council meetings, he said.
“In March 29 and May 6 letters to Chancellor Zimpher, Kowal and NYSUT President Karen E. Magee requested that UUP and NYSUT be removed from the report.
“We cannot and will not endorse a report that is so flawed and one-sided, yet purports to be a legitimate collaboration between SUNY leadership and teacher educators,” said Kowal. “As written, this study goes out of its way to avoid the professional expertise and actual experiences of teacher educators, while thwarting attempts by our members to address real issues that need fixing.”
“UUPs’ many concerns with the study include:
A failure to acknowledge recent Board of Regents actions to extend teacher certification exam safety nets for the third year in a row and the need to address problems that led to the extensions;
Problems with SUNY’s promotion of a 3.0 GPA admission requirement for undergraduate and graduate teacher ed programs, and failure to analyze the potential barrier this requirement creates for underrepresented and disadvantaged students who have the potential to develop and excel with appropriate mentoring and support;
A failure to discuss problems with the state’s flawed teacher certification process and how the process has impacted declining teacher ed program enrollments;
The lack of focus on diversity in the teaching force and the need to recruit underrepresented groups into the teaching profession;
Legitimizing reform groups such as the NCTQ by citing them as experts when they command little respect among education professionals;
Supporting Simulating Teaching as a way to expand clinical experiences for student teachers even though there is no research to back the program’s effectiveness, while neglecting to analyze current obstacles to expansion of actual clinical experiences;
Accepting the state’s flawed Annual Professional Performance Review system without regard to recent Board of Regents implementation changes; and
Advocating for expansion of private alternatives to public education, a complex subject that requires far more extensive analysis than the TeachNY study.
“Hopefully, the chancellor will see the error of her ways and we can work together to produce a viable, workable report that takes a 360-degree view of this important issue,” Kowal said.”
There will be nothing done to improve the teachers shortage because Mary Ellen Elia is an agent of disruptive chang, and she was hired from Florida to destroy the public schools and crush the teaching profession and its corporate hated labor unions.
KyleBeyer@Camden.K12.NJ.us
What I find interesting from these posts is that from what I heard that NY had an overabundance of teachers – too many as opposed to a teacher shortage
You are correct. At the present time there isn’t a teacher shortage in New York State, except perhaps in the perennially difficult-to-staff areas such as higher-level math, science, and foreign languages. Everywhere else, a glut: http://www.lohud.com/story/news/education/2015/01/23/tough-job-market-teaching-candidates/22235837/
NYSUT is correct in saying that there needs to be much greater attention paid to recruiting, training, and retaining teachers of color. A recent piece in Politico about the controversy surrounding Dr. Steve Perry’s appearance at a parent event in Buffalo quoted an advocate who said that 93% of the teachers in the Buffalo Public Schools are white, and only 1% are men of color. That statistic in and of itself ought to be an urgent call to action.
On the national level, agencies and states need to work to remove whatever barriers exist that make it difficult for teachers to take their credentials and move to where the kids are.
Gee, Tim, perhaps if the so-called reformers you reliably stick up for here didn’t engage in wholesale (New Orleans) and retail (NYC, Newark, Chicago, et. al.) purges of teachers of color, there might not be such a need to recruit them.
Anyway, all this talk about a shortage is a smokescreen to open the door to still more bogus “alternative certification” scams, further embedding the idea that teaching is temp work.
….further embedding the idea that teaching is LOW-PAID temp work….
Again, equity before excellence.
Perhaps as it should be, HU. Sometimes equity and fairness should trump supposed excellence.
You put your finger exactly on the crucial philosophical question. Would you care to make the case that the prime objective of the public schools should be equity (however defined) rather than excellence of intellectual training?
J. H. Underhill
I was going to say “I’m not so sure. . . ) but actually I am sure that one doesn’t have to choose one or the other. Dichotomous thinking is simplistic thinking that has served to get us into the current mess. There definitely can be and should be both in a classroom. I tried my best to ensure that both were part of my classroom, much as I assume (from our conversations) that you probably did the same in your classes.
They are not mutually exclusive. Equitable opportunities does not preclude excellence in academics, the arts, or in sports.
Theoretically, you are of course correct. In practice, however, excellence requires selection and selection is not possible with equity.
J. H. Underhill
They will do like they did in technology jobs – recruit less qualified and cheaper employees (H1bs), reduce the quality of instruction, try to replace teachers with computers.
Nevada business leaders led by our lieutenant governor have rolled out a nearly identical set of proposals. They all clearly use the same play book. They will be shocked when it does not work….
P.S. The legislature claims that the vouchers will aid the school districts and reduce overcrowding by having kids go to private schools. They also claim that this will help alleviate the teacher shortage because fewer teachers will be needed. They clearly are all about profits. The vast majority, 90 + percent of those that have applied for vouchers are parents that already send their kids to private schools. They are also appealing the requirement that children had to have attended the public schools. The state treasurer has admitted that he wanted to issue funds as quickly as possible to force the court’s hands politically, as his office has no oversight structure to see where the money is going…..just another business leveraged ponzi scheme the likes of which Nevada is noted for.
Upton Sinclair’s observation is all the explanation you need:
“It is difficult to get a man [or in this case woman] to understand something, when his [her] salary depends on his [her] not understanding it.”
Elia has made millions of dollars over the past decade by not understanding things — first effectively working for Bill Gates (in a Florida district) and now working for Andrew Cuomo where she pulls down a cool quarter million per year.
No worries. They’ll go through with this initiative, botch the launch, and wind up doing less damage than if they had done it intelligently. This kind of thing has become NYSED’s raison d’etre , apparently: to incompetently plan really stupid ideas.
Here is the video of these 2 ladies talking about the teacher shortage:
http://www.twcnews.com/nys/rochester/capital-tonight-interviews/2016/05/24/nancy-zimpher-maryellen-elia-052416.html
Maybe it’s just me but I think they did more to hurt their cause than to help it. What a joke, neither could talk without stumbling over their own words. I almost felt sorry for them watching this (almost!). Clearly they don’t know what they are talking about or how to answer the question or dilemma that is the immanent teacher shortage in NY. BTW, this problem is already here. Look in any local NY paper and I guarantee you will find adds for teaching jobs that are many miles away. Would love to hear what anyone has to say that watched this!