Archives for category: Jeb Bush

Coach Bob Sikes in Florida knows how phony that state’s A-F grading system is. (This was confirmed recently by Matt Di Carlo of the Shanker Institute, who pointed out that the state changed the system to improve the results.)

Now he finds that Oklahoma State Superintendent Janet Barresi is copying the Jeb Bush playbook.

This is hardly surprising because she is a member of the Jeb Bush group of rightwing state superintendents called “Chiefs for Change.”

Barresi wants Oklahoma to grade its schools with a simple-minded A-F grade, just like Jeb Bush did. If Jeb did it, it must be right. Remember the “Florida miracle”?

Unfortunately a group of Oklahoma researchers examined her proposal and sharply criticized it.

No problem for Barresi. She has been going around the state telling people that the researchers have recanted their views. Except they haven’t.

Before Barresi was elected superintendent, she was a speech pathologist. In 1984, she became a dentist. Later, she opened Oklahoma City’s first charter school and served on the board of another charter school. She is a big supporter of privatization.

 

 

I read on Twitter just now that I compared “school choice” to a Nazi invasion.

 

Excellence in Ed ‏@ExcelinEd

@DianeRavitch likens school choice to Nazi invasion. Yes. You read that correctly. 
http://bit.ly/Y7svLC

 

To say the least, I was taken aback because I had never written or implied any such thing.

But consider the source.

It comes from Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Excellence in Education (“excellence” in this case meaning the promotion of vouchers, charters, and advancing the interest of for-profit entrepreneurs in the public sector).

The post in question was http://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/19/what-about-the-good-charters/.

Jeb Bush–or whoever writes his foundation’s tweets–deliberately misconstrued the post, as well as its authorship.

It was not written by me.

It was written as a comment by a reader on the blog.

I post many readers’ comments, for the sake of discussion, not because I endorse them.

The comment was in response to an earlier post by Mark Naison and Bruce Bernstein: http://dianeravitch.net/2013/02/16/how-to-tell-if-your-local-charter-school-is-avaricious

I am delighted to learn that Jeb Bush and his staff are reading this blog closely.

Maybe they will learn something new.

Maybe they will hear the voices of parents, teachers, students, school board members, and others who are not invited to their corporate conferences.

I hope they spend some time working to improve their ability to comprehend what they read.

Decoding will get you just so far, and no farther.

 

 

Jeb Bush’s organization tweeted on the morning of February 20 that I “liken school choice to Nazi invasion.” Whoever posted that tweet under the name of Jeb Bush’s organization either maliciously ignored the fact that the first sentence of the post says that the post was written by a parent, or was confused by the formatting. I did not liken school choice to a Nazi invasion, period.

I can’t do anything to diminish the malice of others, but I did revise the post to insert the words, “she writes” to make clear where her comment begins. And I added the link to the Naison-Bernstein post to which the comment refers.

I want to add that I defend the right of everyone to use historical analogies to refer to current events. People do that all the time, as well they should. Free speech permits anyone to use analogies to slavery, Jim Crow, the Brown decision, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, the Chinese Cultural Revolution, the Great Depression, McCarthyism, Prohibition, the Holocaust, Chamberlain, the Munich Pact, the Cuban Missile Crisis, Pearl Harbor, or any other historical event or person to make a point. I believe in free speech. It is your choice to like their analogy or not like it, but it insults the intelligence of everyone to say that all historical analogies are out of bounds. If people make ridiculous analogies, then it makes them look ridiculous.

So to clear up any confusion, here is where the original blog begins.

 

 

 

This parent takes issue with Mark Naison and Bruce Bernstein, who wrote a post about how to tell whether your local charter school is avaricious. The few “good charters” are used by the corporate charter chains to clear the path:

She writes:

Superb list. Very true. However, I must disagree with this sentence: “We will not categorically write off charter schools because there are some great ones.”

Maybe. But the privatizers declared war on our schools, our kids, our teachers, our parents and our taxpayers.

We didn’t start this war, any more than Poland in 1939. But we must fight back. And ultimately, emerge victorious.

And when you’re in a war, and you’re defending the lives of your community, unfortunately, nuance or thoughtful qualifications become luxuries we can no longer afford.

Every “ed reformer” has lines like this down pat: “Well, charter schools aren’t a silver bullet. I’d never pretend that they’ll solve all of our education challenges. And I’ll be the first to admit that there are some bad apples. But we should all acknowledge that there are some great ones…” blah blah blah and before you know it, you wake up one day and you’re living in Detroit, New Orleans, Philadelphia or Indianapolis, with the mayor running the show, and cutting up “the pie” for all his fellow country clubbers and new billionaire buddies.

You may technically be right about some “good charters”, but I think such a reasonable concession is just what they’ll use as an excuse to then drive a truck right through it.

Coach Bob Sikes reports here that Jeb Bush’s Foundation for Educational Excellence is under fire by groups who claim that it is promoting the for-profit interests of its corporate sponsors.

The Bush foundation, which presumably has a tax exemption, claims that 90% of its funding comes from philanthropic donors, not corporations.

This investigation in Maine shows the relationship between the Bush foundation, its chief strategist, and the corporations that stood to benefit financially from the activities of the Bush team.

And any investigation into the connection between the Foundation for Education Excellence and its sponsors should definitely look at the Ten Elements of Digital Learning. (Notice the long list of corporate sponsors, all in the business of selling digital products.)

Between the two Bush brothers–George W. and Jeb–the nation’s education system is locked into a regime of endless testing, grading, evaluating, marking, measuring, etc.

It doesn’t seem to get us very far. After all, Texas has been in this business for as long as anyone can remember–was it the mid-80s?–and folks there are still complaining about failing schools.

And Texas is not # 1 anyway, Massachusetts is.

Florida is supposedly the model state, because it started giving grades to all its schools and closing the ones with low marks, and opening charters.

But it turns out that there are lots of failing charters

And again, Florida is not #1. Massachusetts is.

Coach Bob of Florida brings us up to the date on Florida’s nutty accountability system.

Think about it.

What corporation would be proud that it had created a quality-control system that made its employees demoralized and angry?

If this is a business model, it’s bad business. Or monkey business.

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 59,249 other followers